Tag
Behind the ScenesBy Maura Burke
If we hope researchers will share rejected grant applications or other unrealized research materials, then greater recognition of their scholarly value will also be necessary.
Read
Culture of Trial and ErrorBy Sheena F. Bartscherer
Heterogenous communities with explicit commitments to science corrections or what this blog series summarises under the descriptor ‘cultures of trial and error’ have existed for the longest time.
Read
Culture of Trial and ErrorBy Anne Clinio
Open notebook science challenges the traditional ways we produce and share knowledge, creating a more transparent and collaborative approach to research that could foster science correction
Read
InterviewBy Marcel Hobma & Stefan Gaillard
We present to you the fourth instalment of our “JOTE in conversation” series, where we ask Leo Tiokhin about Red Team Market and his career.
Read
NewsBy Marcel Hobma & Sarahanne Field
We will welcome submissions for registered reports (RRs)! We see moves to publishing RRs as part of a broader, cultural move in academia towards more rigorous and transparent research.
Read
OpinionBy Marcel Hobma
Philosophers teach us that science is drenched in values, but what does this mean for science communication? Editor Marcel reflects on what values mean for his earlier work on clinical trials.
Read
OpinionBy Martijn van der Meer
In recent attempts to reform research assesment, metrics have explicitly become “incentives”. Yet, the Dutch debate about this transition focussed on the wrong elements.
Read
OpinionBy Marcel Hobma
More and more researchers pay processing costs for publishing in Open Access, but these costs disadvantage authors who are female, early in their career or, from low-income countries.
Read
OpinionBy Sarahanne Field & Sean Devine
We should beware of using Ariely and others as scapegoats. Rather than dwelling on the moral failings of individual researchers, we might reframe fraud and misconduct as a systemic problem.
Read
InterviewBy Max Bautista Perpinya & Daniel Lakens
So if you ask, ‘who’s responsible?’ The truth is that everybody’s pointing but nobody is doing anything.
Read
Behind the ScenesBy Stefan Gaillard & Max Bautista Perpinya
On February 6, the Open Science Community Utrecht (OSCU) organized a symposium on Open Science at the Faculty of Science of Utrecht University.
Read
OpinionBy Stefan Gaillard & Martijn van der Meer
Vorige week presenteerde minister Van Engelshoven haar langverwachte ‘Strategische Agenda voor het hoger onderwijs en onderzoek’.
Read
Behind the ScenesBy Alex Visser
When I first heard the term “open science” and realized what it meant, I thought, well, that sounds good, how hard can it be?
Read
Behind the ScenesBy Stefan Gaillard
One of our first alliances was with the Open Science Community Utrecht (OSCU). Stefan was already a member, so it was relatively easy for him to come into contact with the founders of OSCU.
Read
Behind the ScenesBy Stefan Gaillard
It truly was the most wonderful time of the year: the last Descartes Centre Colloquium of 2018. The Descartes Centre, of course, is a place of legend, it is right up there with El Dorado.
Read
Behind the ScenesBy Martijn van der Meer
An Open Science talk by Dr. Katja Mayer, who investigates practices of Open Science in computational Open Science and big data...
Read
Behind the ScenesBy Martijn van der Meer
After a course in philosophy of science and a historiographical course on the history of the natural sciences, we had gotten a taste of what the rest of the program could be...
Read